TEST IXLA HOME

The curriculum review workflow starts with the faculty submitter. A complete proposal routes to the department chair.

The department chair circulates the proposal with the department faculty (or department curriculum committee, if applicable). The chair also consults with other affected colleges, departments and programs. Once reviewed by the department faculty, the chair enters the decision or returns the proposal for changes. An approved proposal continues in the workflow and is routed to the college associate dean. An automatic notification is sent to the library.

The associate dean routes the proposal to the college curriculum committee. Once reviewed by the committee, the designee enters the decision or returns the proposal for changes. An approved proposal continues in the workflow.

The associate dean routes the proposal to the Ethnic Studies Academic Committee (ESAC), if applicable. ESAC reviews undergraduate courses proposed to meet the Ethnic Studies (ES) designation. The ESAC chair enters the committee’s decision or returns the proposal for changes.

The associate dean circulates the college’s approved proposals with the university associate deans, EPC/GSC chairs, executive secretaries and recording secretaries. Modification and/or consultation may be requested prior to full committee review.

The associate dean routes the college’s approved proposals to EPC (undergraduate) or GSC (graduate). In some cases a proposal may need to be reviewed by both committees. Once reviewed by EPC and/or GSC the designee enters the decision or returns the proposal for changes. An approved proposal will continue in the workflow.

The EPC/GSC recording secretaries route the approved proposals to the registrar. The appropriate campus area will update SOLAR or DARS and mark the proposal as complete, ending the workflow. An email notification with a link to the archived proposal is sent to the submitter, department chair and associate dean.